More on Bad Sounding Data

Jimmie C. wrote: I was a little loose with my "fix" comment. At least from an automated perspective, any QC of the data would flag that layer as being bad, and thus you could simply remove that data from the sounding. Not ideal, nor entirely a correct procedure. However, the character of the failures between the two soundings appeared was quite different. I would rather keep a marginally bad sounding (where a shallow layer fails) than one where the entire sounding appears to have suffered a failure.