Cool Morning Here - Snow in Salt Lake City

Wet snow this morning in the Salt Lake City area. Very cool morning here at house with a low of 40F - impressive events given it's the last week in May!

More On Summer 2010 Outlook

John Diebolt (thanks John!) said: agree with the comments regarding the Climate Prediction Center's outlooks, the three-class system is misleading to the average person - They just look at the map and think well the darker the red, the warmer it will be, and those white areas mean normal temperatures, etc. Not to mention here in the SW we are seemingly permanently outlooked as above average to the casual observer. On a side note, I would like to offer kudos to Eric Pytlak for putting together his briefing. Monsoon season forecasting is terribly hard. Trying to refine so many variables into a local or regional-scale forecast would have been almost unheard of 10-15 years ago. Remember this time last year most indicators were pointing solidly to a wet and strong season? We wound up with a parade of low latitude closed lows well into early summer then a mid level high seemingly as jittery as a college kid on caffine- never in one spot for more than a day..and nearly always in the 'wrong' place for us. With the atmosphere/ocean circulations in such a rapid transition phase, anything could happen this year and I thought as a season opening salvo, Erik did a great job!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
First: let's review the details of last year's "Outlook" as per the web briefing hosted by U of A CLIMAS late last May:

Monsoon

The 2009 monsoon in the Southwest is forecast to be early and wet. During a Web briefing Thursday, May 21, scientists from The University of Arizona; the National Weather Service (NWS); Servicio Nacional Meteorológico, Mexico’s national weather service; and the National Center for Atmospheric Research emphasized the forecast applies to June and July but becomes more uncertain for August into September.

“The large-scale signal suggests the monsoon will arrive early and will be wet and strong,” said Chris Castro, an assistant professor of atmospheric sciences at the UA. The days leading up to the rains, he said, are likely to be very hot and dry. However, recent rainfall during the third week of May was not caused by the monsoon.

The NWS forecasts a 33 to 45 percent chance of above-average rainfall in June, but the forecast becomes increasingly uncertain later in the summer, said Erik Pytlak, a NWS meteorologist in Tucson. One reason is that forecasts indicate a rapid development of an El Niño event this summer into fall, which can weaken the easterly winds characteristic of the monsoon and bring drier weather to the Southwest.

-------------------------------------------------------

As John reported in his comment - these outlooks didn't verify well at all. The summer storms and rains weren't early and the first part of summer was not wet (at least in the Tucson and Phoenix regions - I'm not sure about far southeast Arizona (Art ?). Those who read my blog last summer know that I often referred to the dismal summer weather as the "nonsoon."

------------------------------------------------------

My first question for anyone out there with an opinion: With the current, totally ambivalent, situation, should the LOCAL NWS be providing any climate forecast information, other than repeating what CPC has to say and referring questions to the "experts" at CPC?

Giant Agave Falls

Although winds around the Tucson metro area have only been gusting up to 40 mph early this afternoon, they have been strong enough to take down the magnificent agave stalk that was blooming in the courtyard. Apparently the gusts swirling around the house and garage produced too much stress for the very heavy stalk. It's a sad loss since I had hoped we could have it decorating the courtyard until next winter.

Strong Cold Front

Back to some real-time weather. This morning a strong 500 mb short-wave trough is approaching central and northern Arizona (see the current NAM 500 mb forecast for 5 pm MST this afternoon - top). Strong low-level cool advection will be associated with the surface cold front that crosses Arizona during the day today (see the current NAM 850 mb forecast in lower panel). Front is coming off the Pacific fairly strong (currently 16C temperature gardient between Tucson and San Diego at 850 mb), but over the Southwest it will be fighting intense solar insolation. Looks like another dry, windy and dusty weather system - par for the course this time of year!

------------------------------------------------------

More on the summer outlook later today.

More On The Summer Outlook

First - above are the complete maps for yesterday's summer season outlooks from NOAA-NWS-Climate Prediction Center. If the reader has the interest, and the courage, to learn exactly how to interpret these maps venture off to:

http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/predictions/long_range/seasonal_info.php

----------------------------------------------------------------

Second, Chuck Doswell has further commented:

----------------------------------------------------------------

So this looks more like a gross misinterpretation by the media than a really dumb statement by the NWS? If so, I'm certainly not surprised about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------

I think that there were stumbles at all three organizations involved in reporting this to the public.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Climate Prediction Center produces a hard to understand product - check the link above and then think about what percentage of the general public, reporters included, could explain these maps to another person. Note that CPC now has an experimental version online that would outlook just two categories - above and below - and these charts should be more easily understood by general users.

---------------------------------------------------------------

I think that the local NWS tried to produce a one-size-fits-all briefing rather than considering their three types of local customers (general public, media, and the local climate and weather research community). This generic approach produced a briefing that had problems regardless of which user community members actually hung in there and watched the whole thing. This is just my personal guess.

----------------------------------------------------------------

The Arizona Star reporter, probably in frustration, wrote his cynical condensation of the briefing content for his online blurb yesterday evening. I suspect that he's caught lots of crap for the early version.

More on the NWS Summer 2010 Forecast

The actual online NWS briefing for summer 2010 is available at the Tucson office webpage:

http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/twc/

and the link is under Top News of the Day. The briefing has eight components (i.e., clearly not designed for those with short attention spans): 1) Monsoon 2010 Forecast, 2) What is the Monsoon?, 3) Where are we now?, 4) El Nino/Southern Oscillation forecast, 5) Soil moisture and the Monsoon, 6) Official NWS forecast: July-September, 7) What could change?, and 8) Track the Monsoon with us! Shown above are the graphics used in parts 6 and 7. The official NWS CPC summer outlook is fairly typical and doesn't seem very enlightning - certainly not filled with information that people can easily understand or use to make decisions. Thus, I can easily understand reporter Beal's short-take, cynical overview. The full story that Beal has filed this morning follows:

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Conflicting signals about next monsoon

Tom Beal Arizona Daily Star Posted: Friday, May 21, 2010 12:00 am

It's going to be hot this summer, probably, and we'll have less rain or more rain than usual, according to the National Weather Service, which posted its first online monsoon briefing for 2010 on Thursday.

The North American Monsoon, a seasonal shift to southerly winds that brings moisture to the Southwest each summer from the the gulfs of California and Mexico, responds to a variety of atmospheric circumstances.

Generally, Southern Arizona receives less summer rain when the winter rains are above average, as they have been this year, said Erik Pytlak, monsoon researcher with the National Weather Service in Tucson.

That's because moist ground in the Plains states slows the heating needed to lure a high-pressure system northward from Mexico. The monsoon, which usually brings thunderstorms to Tucson by early July, won't start early and could be a little late, Pytlak said.

The monsoon could intensify later in the season, however, if the Pacific Ocean cools, a phenomenon known as La Niña - the flip-side of the El Niño warming that cut off last summer's monsoon prematurely.

Cooling oceans increase the contrast between temperatures over land and sea. As the sun warms the land, heat rises and cooler, moister air rushes in. The computer models are divided on whether the ocean-cooling phenomenon, known as La Niña, will occur.

Right now, most models call for average ocean temperatures, a condition the scientists call "El Niño neutral."

"In an El Niño-neutral year, the most likely thing to happen is near average rainfall," Pytlak said.

Officially, the National Weather Service forecasts "a 40 to 55 percent chance of above-average temperature" and "equal chances for above or below-average rainfall."

"There are conflicting signals out there now and quite a bit of uncertainty," Pytlak said.

RE NWS Summer Outlook For 2010

Chuck Doswell comments:

While this might be a somewhat out-of-context statement (I don't know one way or the other), at face value, it's just outright embarrassing for the NWS. One would think that statements like this need to be reviewed by someone capable of finding such gaffes before they're disseminated. Is that too much to ask?

Steve Mullen sent along the link to comments on the brief story posted previously:

http://dynamic.azstarnet.com/comments/viewcomments.php?id=/news/local/article_f0ed0896-6451-11df-bf32-001cc4c002e0.html&h=Weather%20Service%20posts%20Monsoon%20briefing%20for%20Southern%20Arizona

-------------------------------------------------------------------
My quick take on the brief story that reporter Tom Beal filed online yesterday is that it reflected a cynical frustration with how little real information was conveyed during a fairly long briefing. He has filed an extended story this morning.

The firestorm of mostly nasty or negative comments in reponse to the brief story posted yesterday is a bit surprising - putting the NWS summer outlook up there with some controversial policy and political issues that always have comments galore of this type.

NWS Outlook For Summer 2010

From today's Arizona Star:

Weather Service posts Monsoon briefing for Southern Arizona
By Tom Beal Arizona Daily Star Posted: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:51 pm

It’s going to be hot this summer and we’ll either have more or less rain than usual, according to the National Weather Service, which posted its first online briefing for the Monsoon season today.

If you want to know why, you can listen to Weather Service monsoon expert Erik Pytlak explain it all.

Click on “2010 Monsoon Forecast Web Briefing” at http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/twc/

Well-Travelled Agave Does Its Thing

Have a great agave in bloom (they are generically called century plants because of how long it takes many varities to bloom) but I'm not sure of this one's exact variety. I do know it is very well-travelled. I bought it in about 1990 from Yucaa Doo Nursery northwest of Houston. So it came to Oklahoma by mail and then was planted in the backyard in Norman. Around 1996 I moved it to Tucson in a pot. Then in early 1999 it was planted in a spot in our courtyard, where it is now blooming. The stalk is about 22 feet tall by my estimate. As with most agave, this is its grand finale, and it will gradually die as the summer progresses.

Had To Turn On the Cooling Systems!

Plots are from Atmo weather station on campus. Top plot shows that breezy conditions continue to prevail here in southeastern Arizona. Bottom plot shows T and Td. After a nice cool day last Wednesday the highs have been inching up each day. I gave up this afternoon and switched the

cooling systems on for the summer. This is fairly involved for the main house and we are now committed to cooling and no heat, so this is a fairly important decision twice each year.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The main house is constructed of 16-inch wide mud, adobe bricks. With about 2 inches of mud plaster inside, the walls are about 18-inches thick. Thus, for about 3 months each spring and fall the thermal inertia of these massive bricks keeps the house cool/warm without the need for much use of the heating/cooling systems. Very nice for the utility bills. Of course the other six months of the year the heating/cooling systems are fighting the thermal inertia of the bricks - so all-in-all, yearly utility costs may be about the same as for other types of construction.

Early Morning Severe Thunderstorms

Very impressive bow-echo line of unusual, early morning storms out to west of Del Rio, Texas, straddling the Rio Grande. The IR satellite image at top shows a spectacular horseshoe shape of the cold tops, with an interior warm-wake. This signature nearly always is associated with storms that are severe.

Nighthawks Have Also Returned

There were two nighthawks (sometimes called bull bats) flying low and hunting insects over the house at dusk last evening. This was my first sighting of the nighthawks this year - their return is a sure sign that summer has begun here. These birds apparently winter in South America. Later in the summer I've observed as many as 20 to 40 birds within a couple of hundred yards of the house. Their erratic flight as they pick-off insects appears similar to bats and is probably where the bull bat name came from. They are quite amazing to watch as they fly very low and fast, somehow avoiding collisions.

Bats Have Returned

About 4 tiny bats make their home among the vigas of our front porch each summer. The bats returned early this week for about the eighth year. They are very small bats and start hunting insects in the early evening. They look much like butterflies when they are flying around - so much so, that I've always called them "butterfly bats." They are officially known as Western Pipistrelle bats, and they are now in residnece here at the house for the summer.

This Morning's Worst RRS Soundings

One from Norman, right outside of the Storm Prediction Center, and one from Tampa, where the winds are really kicking up.

Last of the Signs

This is the last of the little series of signs - easy to tell there's not much weather out here until the summer thunderstorm season arrives! I have been grabbing these sign images from:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/05/11/travel/funny-signs.html?emc=eta1

Stormy Night On Tap Across Southern New England

Quick look at the new upper-air data and latest radar indicate a stormy night for northern Pennsylvania and southern New England. Very strong low-level warm advection occurring and upstream airmass increasingly unstable. Latest radar and Pittsburgh sounding shown above. The sounding appears to not be unstable enough to support a nocturnal derecho, but situation bears watching!

Lots of Storms Central U.S.

And with lots of storms activie there are a number of strange looking soundings this morning. Looks like the Minneapolis data (above) capture honors for the most bizarre RRS sounding, with the flight apparently spending some time in an updraft and then coming out with a wetted RH sensor, resulting in a serious superadiabatic layer aloft. So it goes.

More Sign Language

Interesting Sign

I certainly can relate. I also realize that this warning can be interpreted in many ways.

-------------------------------------------------

On the weather front, not much to report. Was a chilly morning here with a low of 39F -

still haven't had to turn on cooling systems, which is very nice as well as economical!

Nocturnal MCS Rolls Across Parts of Midwest

Images above show the MCS over central Missouri at around 3 am CST, with activity extending to parts of nearby states. There were some severe reports during the night, but not as many as I expected - see previous post.

Stormy Night On Tap

Have just been examining this evening's 00 UTC soundings. Very substantial CAPE from north-central Texas, across most of Oklahoma, and eastward across northern Arkansas and southern Missouri. Much of this region will experience strong low-level warm advection during the coming night and substantial severe thunderstorm activity is probable, even though the afternoon has generally been supressesed. First strong storms have just developed over western Oklahoma and they may reach to southern Illinois before morning. See Springfiled, Missouri sounding above, which is primed for rapid storm development.

More Comments On NWS RRS Sonde Problems

I received the following news blurb from El Paso:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for re-lighting the RRS fire. Something of interest for you -- we currently have a group of people from the Sterling Field Support Center visiting EPZ. They are going to be launching comparison flights, testing different sondes starting today.

This suddenly was announced to us all a couple weeks ago. Very surprising, as there has been no talk of RRS sonde replacement that I've heard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My thoughts on this news:

Wouldn't it be helpful if NWS alerted their own internal users about what's going on! And it would be amazing if external users of NWS upper-air data were filled in on both all the problems and the long-term plans for fixing the system. I have heard rumors that they (NWS, Observing Systems Branch, Chief - joseph.facundo@noaa.gov - if any readers have questions) are moving on a fast track to replace the flawed Sippican humidity sensor, and that the entire Sippican Microsonde will eventually be replaced.

Bob

Case Example Continued

This is a continuation of the post below, so start down there.

-------------------------------------------------------------

At top, graphic is the WRF 18 hour rainfall forecast from 12 UTC 4 August, 2008, after the model was initialized using the NWS NAM initial fields. Convective precipitation is over-forecast to a fairly serious degree (relative to the radar rainfall estimates shown in previous post).

-------------------------------------------------------------

Mike subjectively corrected the PW initial field by removing 3 mm of PW from the lowest 100 mb of the TWC sounding (admittedly a brute force procedure). The results of a re-run of the WRF model are shown in the bottom graphic. Forcing the PW toward the GPS values apparently minimized the impact of the bad humidity data from the TWC RRS sounding, since the new forecast was much more similar to the radar rainfall estimates.

--------------------------------------------------------------

This simple example indicates primarily that bad humidity data from RRS sondes does contaminate the NAM initial conditions. The NOAA folks in Boulder, who run the RUC model, have been experimenting with using the GPS PW in initializing the model. I'll see if I can chase down a reference.

Quick Case Example of Bad Sounding Impacts on WRF Model

Mike Leuthold sent a link to his daily WRF model discussions - it is from 4 August 2008 and it is just a quick, subjective, example of how bad RRS sounding data can affect the WRF model forecasts. I'll have to do two posts to get four graphics up here.

----------------------------------------------------------

Top figure shows the TWC (Tucson) morning RRS sounding. This flight had a moisture sensor that was responding very slowly to changes in RH (this is my subjective guess at the problem on this flight) leading to PW contents higher than those indicated by GPS values.

----------------------------------------------------------

Bottom figure is radar-based rainfall estimates for the 24 hours ending at 12 UTC on August 5, 2008. The key thing to note is that the estimates indicate that the 24-hour period was very suppressed over southeast Arizona wrt convective storms.

Mike Leuthold Comments:

Bob, I wanted to comment on the occasional high bias seen in the CRP data. This bias occurs when IPW is typically above 30mm, but, of course, not always. I've even noticed this at Tucson during wet periods of the monsoon and this bad RSS data does make it into the models and also gives anomalously high CAPE values. So, it's not just a dry bias with the RRS!

Questions Continued

Jimmie C. says - Awesome plots and thanks for highlighting this issue in the Plains as well. Is the GPS data available online? I saw the GSD website has images but what about actual data files for select stations?

I ask because I wonder how much balloon drift may effect the RRS PW. It is clear from the GPS data that there are rapid small scale changes occurring and I wonder if that has a big enough impact to cause the differences you are seeing. I suspect one could correlate the differences in PW to distance the balloon traveled.

An off the cuff thought was to see how inversion strength or lapse rates might affect the GPS measurement. I certianly don't think the RRS moisture sensor is error free, but the randomness might be explained by multiple factors and then you get at the systematic issues.

An interesting mystery and one worthy of exploring.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of these questions/issues relate to the differences in, and the accuracy of, the two observing systems.

I consider the go-to-expert here to be Seth Gutman at the NOAA labs in Boulder.

seth.i.gutman@noaa.gov

Since the GPS calculations are using data from a number of different GPS satellites, and thereby incorporating a number of "lines of sight", I suspect that the GPS observations may be more "representative" than are the RRS (or any sounding instrument) data taken along a trajectory determined by the local winds and rate of balloon rise.

I do suspect that the first order problems with the RRS PW values relate to sensor problems of several types. Since most of the PW is present in the early part of the flight, the 4-D trajectory may contribute much less to inaccuracies, except in the case of extreme horizontal gradients.
--------------------------------------------------
Several interesting issues relate to your questions. It should be straight forward to examine the data observed in any sounding with respect to: where were the data actually taken in time and space. Of course, it is much easier to assume (falsely, of course) that the observed data are positioned directly above the release point. At some point in the fairly distant past such an assumption was easily justified - however, it is much harder to justify such an assumption given the computing power available today. I am constantly amazed that someone, or some organization, doesn't provide upper-level plots with the data properly located in space. Or, maybe someone does? The time issue is a bit tougher. I suppose that model initialization procedures could (or do?) use the observed data exactly when and where the observation occurred.
-------------------------------------------------
Another issue involves the standardized observing times for upper-air data. The reasons for taking data globally at 00 and 12 UTC were/are quite sound. However, given that 4-D data assimilation seems to drive things today, it would appear that all upper-air data might not need to be taken so rigidly wrt time. A local Arizona example - consider the NWS soundings taken near Flagstaff in the summertime. At 12 UTC in the morning the sounding typically samples an extreme surface-based temperature inversion, often making evaluation of convective potential difficult. Convective storms up in the Flagstaff area tend to occur between 11 am to 3 pm or so in the afternoon. Thus, the 00 UTC sounding is often sampling a local environment that has been contaminated by storms. The obvious question is: why not allow the Flagstaff sounding to be flown at times more in sync with forecasting local convection?

Re: Several Questions

From John D. - Bob, I have read your posts about the dry bias in this eqipment for the past two Monsoon seasons here in AZ. I know the impact bad sounding data can have on modeling the daily forecast during the monsoon. Has this bad data had a negative impact on the GFS model itself on a much larger scale?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know if the various problems with data from the RRS sondes are impacting the GFS and NAM forecasts. I would think that folks at NCEF would be evaluating these issues. At times it is obvious that bad data have gotten into the standard level analyses and you'd think that, in such situations, there would be some impact on the forecasts. Remember that the NWS official position seems to be that the data problems with RRS sondes do not impact their forecasts. However, I know that short-term forecasts of convection can be adversely affected, and there are a number of posts here over the last two summers illustrating such situations.

At U of A Atmospheric Sciences, Mike Leuthold runs a high-resolution version of the WRF model routinely. He has found that, especially in the warm season, the forecasts of convection within the model are strongly influenced by the initial precipitable water field. Since these are often inaccurate wrt to GPS precipitable water observations, he routinely uses GPS PW to "correct" the inital analyses of several NWS models.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This winter alone it seemed as if ECMWF has consistently outperformed the GFS.(Maybe this is just my perception) I would think bad data going into a complex mathematical formula would exponetially increase errors forward in time..especially if the bad data was so random. On a side note, any thoughts on why the EC model did so well this past winter vs the GFS?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not a modeler, but even a fairly casual user of models has likely noticed that the ECMWF usually does better than the NWS GFS model (not always though, which keeps things interesting). I suspect that there are at least two things at play. The ECMWF operational time lines are not as stringent as those of NWS, and they spend more time and effort in the initialization process. I also think that the resolution of the ECMWF is superior to that of the GFS. Many folks on the Albany MAPS list could probably provide you a much better answer than I can.

Classic Severe Storm Signature in Satellite IR Data

The current IR satellite image shows a classic (references on request) signature associated with the severe thunderstorm in northeast Kansas - this signature is often called a "warm-wake" with the coldest storm tops forming a horse-shoe shape down-wind of the highest tops,resulting in warmer IR temperatures in the wake of the highest storm tops. More in the morning - including my answers to John D.'s questions.

Radar Graphics - Continuation of Previous Post

Even though it is not yet 0300Z on May 7th, storms are already ocurring well south of where the NAM predicted precitation overnight. The storms west of Topeka (bottom radar image with Wichita at top) are obviously very intense storms and 2 1/2 inch hail has already been reported.

Severe Storms Tonight Further South Than Model predictions

An interesting situation tonight. The air mass over southern Plains has substantial CAPE but with a very large CAP. However, very intense low-level warm advection will occur over eastern Kansas and northwestern Missouri during the night, probably breaking the CAP considerably to the south of where the model predicts. Thus, it appears that thunderstorms will affect regions well south of where the NAM model forecasts precipitation overnight (top graphic). The new SPC outlook (bottom graphic) is better in line with the current meteorology, but perhaps a bit conservative. Currently there is an obviously severe thunderstorm, probably with large hail, just to the east of Salina Kansas and a new storm is forming near Topeka. A very interesting night on tap weatherwise!

Continuation of Previous Post

To continue from previous post - I also looked to the east to see how some of the sounding data were comparing to GPS data.

-----------------------------------------------

Top plots show the past month's PW comparison for Little Rock (LZK), Arkansas. The data from LZK have been very dry relative to the GPS observations, indeed much more so that the two southwestern US stations shown in previous post.

-----------------------------------------------

Bottom plots show the past month's PW comparisons for Corpus Christi (CRP), Texas. The RRS data at CRP is typically more moist than the GPS values. BUT, every once in awhile the CRP data are drier than GPS data - sometimes spectacularly so (as per the red diamond in lower left).

----------------------------------------------

So, the problems are not restricted to the dry domain of the Southwest US. They have a significant "random" aspect to them, suggesting that "correcting" the RRS data is perhaps an impossible challenge.

Some Discussion Re RRS Upper-Air Data

The serious problems with data from the new NWS RRS sondes have not gone away - I've just been blogging about other things. I thought I'd return to the RRS subject, since the NWS program is nearing completion over the CONUS. I hope to finish a formal paper on the various problems I've noted with these data during the next couple of months. For now it suffices to say that upper-air data with various degrees of problems are going into the upper-air archives every day, and I repeat my warning to research users that extreme caution is required if you use these data.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday I pulled some plots from the GPS upper-air site ( NOAA site formerly known as FSL). The top data plot compares precipitable water (PW) from GPS data to PW from the RRS soundings at TWC (Tucson). The dry bias continues in the RRS data at TWC, with six soundings having PW more than a standard deviation below the GPS running mean value. Interestingly, the plots from Albuquerque (ABQ - bottom two graphs) indicate that the RRS sounding data have been even drier, relative to the GPS running mean, than have the soundings at Tucson. Note that Albuquerque RRS soundings had PW more than a standard deviation lower than the GPS values on 15 different flights.
------------------------------------------------------------------

The reasons why two close-by upper-air sites should display such differences wrt the GPS observations remains a quirky, technical mystery. One that is probably related somewhat to the variance of individual moisture sensors that occurs somehow in the manufacturing and calibration processes at Sippican. Regardless, one can easily imagine how difficult it would be to try to "correct" the sounding data from TWC and ABQ for the past month.

Late Spring Weather - Breezy with Large Diurnal Swings

Not much to write about these days. View north from Kitt Peak above shows early morning with dirty air trapped near the surface. Winds from the Atmo rooftop anemometer for last seven days, lower graphic, show that it's been quite windy for five of those days, with two days hitting more than 60 mph at that site.

----------------------------------------------------

It has been very dry the last couple of days and, with the increasingly high sun angles, this has allowed large diurnal temperature ranges. The Tucson airport had a high yesterday of 92F, coupled with the observed low here at the house of 38F, indicating that some parts of metro Tucson had a diurnal swing of over 50F. Other observing sites in and near southeastern Arizona that had a diurnal range of near 50F in temperature yesterday included: Nogales 47F; Safford and Sasabe 49F; Douglas and Hachita Valley NM 53F; and Gila Center NM 54F. So the nice crisp, cool morning along the Rillito wash today will rapidly turn to a day of intense sunshine and a need for sunscreen! So it goes in the desert in late spring.

Quick Update to Previous Post

As one of a number of fast moving echoes (see above) went by, we had gusts of 55 to 65 mph here at house around 3:15 pm MST with a light sprinkle shower. Feared that I was going to lose limbs off the trees but didn't. However, suspect that some limbs came down in the area around this part of town.

Not A Pretty Afternoon

At 500 mb the last, strong short-wave/vorticity max with the western US trof is now swinging across northern and eastern Arizona. Not a great afternoon, with mountain showers (see above look to the north from University campus), winds, dust, and blowing pollen. An allergy sufferer's nightmare. Winds generally gusting 30 to 50 mph this afternoon over all but far southwestern parts of the state. The plot above shows wind and gust speeds at the Atmo rooftop anemometer on campus. This afternoon shows up as considerably more gusty than yesterday, with gusts around 60 mph at this time. The coming week will be see a shift back toward more quiet weather as the storm track shifts well to the north, toward the Canadian border.

Active Severe Storm day Yesterday - High Risk Outlooked Today

There were quite a few severe thunderstorms reported yesterday in the central-Mississippi Valley - see top image. Today's outlook from the SPC indicates a high risk today for additional severe thunderstorms to occur as the central US cold front shifts slowly eastward. This pattern also continues to favor locally heavy rains and flash flooding - particularly in areas where organized storm outflows set up orthogonal to the strong southerly, low-level jet.

April Ends on Cool Note

In fact April was a cool, dry, windy, and often dusty month here in southeast Arizona. Here at house rainfall amounted to only 0.10" and the coldest morning low was 24F - probably on the morning of the 2nd but I don't know for certain. I also dont't know how many mornings had lows below 40F - we were away on travel 11 days during the month. To contrast with last April - precip then was 0.44" occurring, just like this year, with a single weather system; however, the lowest low in April 2009 was only 32F on the 5th. This morning's low for May 1st here at house was 33F! I note that last year I had to make the switch from heating to cooling systems on May 3rd - may make it a bit longer this year. The Tucson NWS notes the following for the official observations at the Tucson airport ASOS site:

Coolest April since 1999 Below normal rainfall at the airport Tucson has yet to hit 90 degrees in 2010

El Niño continued its influence on the weather for Tucson during April which resulted in the first April since 2003 (65.7°) to have the average monthly temperature being below normal. This was also the coolest April since 1999 (62.3°). Rainfall was generally below normal across the metro area..